Civil Litigation

Premises Liability Legal Safety Standards! Call (310) 498-2750

What Is The Legal Standard In A Premises Liability Case?

In a premises liability case, the legal standard varies depending on the injured party’s status on the property, applicable state law, and the specific circumstances of the incident. Property owners owe different duties of care to different groups of people, such as invitees, licensees, and trespassers. The standard for invitees, such as customers in a store, is the highest and requires the property owner to maintain the premises in a reasonably safe condition and to warn invitees of any known or foreseeable hazards. Licensees, such as social guests, are owed a lower duty of care, which requires the property owner to warn of known or hidden dangers that are not obvious. Trespassers are typically owed no duty of care unless the property owner knew or should have known about the trespasser’s presence and a danger existed. Ultimately, the legal standard in a premises liability case will depend on the specific facts of the case and the applicable state law.

Premises Liability Lawyer! Call (310) 498-2750

What Experts Are Required In A Premises Liability Case?

Discovery in a premises liability case involves the process of collecting and reviewing evidence related to the accident or incident that occurred on the property. This may include reviewing surveillance footage, interviewing witnesses, and inspecting the premises themselves. The goal of discovery is to uncover all relevant facts and information in order to support the plaintiff’s case and ensure that justice is served. It is important for both parties to approach discovery in a thorough and diligent manner in order to properly assess the strengths and weaknesses of their case, and to prepare for any potential legal disputes that may arise. Ultimately, the outcome of a premises liability case may hinge on the discovery process, as this is where much of the evidence will be presented and analyzed by both sides.

The Sterling Firm is here for your 24/7

Case Brief: Palsgraf vs. Long Island Railroad Co.

Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co. is a landmark case that was decided by the New York Court of Appeals in 1928. The case involved an incident at a train station where a passenger was injured by falling scales which were knocked off the hands of another passenger when the latter was hurriedly trying to board a moving train. The injured passenger, Palsgraf, sued the Long Island Railroad Co. for damages. The court held that the railroad company wasn’t liable for Palsgraf’s injuries as there was no evidence that they had acted negligently or that there was a direct relationship between their actions and Palsgraf’s injuries. This case established the concept of proximate cause which requires a plaintiff to prove that the defendant’s actions were the actual cause of their injuries and that there was a direct relationship between the two. The decision has had far-reaching consequences and has been cited in many subsequent cases.

Shopping Cart